CE Marking and Digital Product Passports

Ta članek še ni na voljo v vašem jeziku, zato je prikazan v angleščini.

Introduction to CE Marking and Digital Product Passports

The CE marking has been the gateway to the European market for decades. Affixed to a product, it signifies that the manufacturer declares conformity with all applicable EU legislation, from electrical safety directives to electromagnetic compatibility requirements. Now, with the arrival of the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), a new layer of compliance is being added: the Digital Product Passport.

The relationship between CE marking and Digital Product Passports is complementary rather than duplicative. CE marking continues to serve as the primary indicator that a product meets essential health, safety, and environmental requirements under applicable EU harmonisation legislation. The DPP, meanwhile, provides a detailed digital record of the product's sustainability characteristics, lifecycle information, and compliance data that goes far beyond what a physical marking can convey.

For manufacturers, understanding how these two compliance frameworks interact is essential for efficient regulatory management. This article examines the relationship between CE marking and DPPs, explains how they work together under the ESPR, and provides practical guidance for businesses navigating both sets of requirements simultaneously.

How CE Marking Works Under Current EU Law

CE marking is a conformity marking required for many product categories sold in the European Economic Area. It indicates that a product has been assessed and meets EU safety, health, and environmental protection requirements. The marking applies to a wide range of products governed by over 25 EU directives and regulations, including the Low Voltage Directive, the Machinery Regulation, the Radio Equipment Directive, and the Medical Devices Regulation.

The CE marking process typically involves several key steps:

• Identifying all applicable EU directives and regulations that apply to the specific product
• Ensuring the product meets the essential requirements set out in those directives, often by applying harmonised European standards
• Carrying out the conformity assessment procedure specified in the applicable legislation, which may involve self-assessment by the manufacturer or third-party assessment by a Notified Body
• Compiling technical documentation that demonstrates compliance with all applicable requirements
• Drafting and signing an EU Declaration of Conformity that lists all applicable legislation and standards
• Affixing the CE marking to the product in a visible, legible, and indelible manner

The CE marking system is underpinned by the New Legislative Framework (NLF), which provides a common legal architecture for product harmonisation legislation across the EU. Understanding this framework is important because the ESPR has been designed to integrate with the NLF, ensuring that DPP requirements complement rather than conflict with existing CE marking obligations.

The ESPR's Impact on CE Marking

The ESPR introduces ecodesign requirements that will apply alongside existing CE marking legislation for many product categories. When a product is subject to both a CE marking directive and an ESPR delegated act, the manufacturer must satisfy both sets of requirements before placing the product on the market. The CE marking, in these cases, will also cover compliance with the applicable ESPR ecodesign requirements.

This means that the EU Declaration of Conformity must reference not only the traditional health and safety directives but also the relevant ESPR delegated acts. The technical documentation supporting the CE marking must include evidence of compliance with ecodesign performance requirements, information requirements, and DPP obligations specified in the applicable delegated act.

For a complete overview of the ESPR's scope and requirements, refer to our comprehensive guide to the EU ESPR regulation, which covers the regulatory framework in detail.

The integration of ESPR requirements into the CE marking framework has several practical implications. Manufacturers will need to update their conformity assessment procedures to incorporate ecodesign criteria. Technical documentation must be expanded to include sustainability performance data, lifecycle analysis results, and DPP-related information. Notified Bodies involved in third-party conformity assessment will need to develop competence in evaluating ecodesign compliance alongside traditional safety requirements.

Digital Product Passports as Compliance Evidence

One of the most significant aspects of the relationship between CE marking and DPPs is the role that the passport plays as a repository of compliance evidence. Under the ESPR framework, the DPP is not just an information tool for consumers and recyclers; it is also a compliance document that market surveillance authorities can access to verify that a product meets its regulatory obligations.

The DPP can serve as a bridge between different regulatory requirements, connecting CE marking conformity data with ecodesign performance information and chemical substance declarations. This integrated approach offers significant benefits for both businesses and regulators. Manufacturers can maintain a single, comprehensive digital record for each product, reducing the administrative burden of managing separate documentation for different regulatory frameworks.

Market surveillance authorities, meanwhile, can use the DPP to conduct more efficient compliance checks. By scanning a product's data carrier, an inspector can access the Declaration of Conformity, technical documentation references, test reports, and sustainability performance data in one place. This level of transparency and accessibility represents a fundamental improvement over the current system, where compliance documentation is often scattered across multiple paper and electronic files.

Businesses preparing for these integrated requirements should consider how their Digital Product Passport systems can be designed to incorporate and cross-reference CE marking documentation from the outset.

Conformity Assessment Procedures Under the ESPR

The ESPR specifies the conformity assessment procedures that manufacturers must follow to demonstrate compliance with ecodesign requirements. For most product categories, the regulation allows manufacturers to use internal production control (Module A), which means that conformity assessment can be carried out by the manufacturer without involving a Notified Body. However, delegated acts for specific product categories may require more rigorous procedures, including third-party verification.

The conformity assessment procedure for ESPR compliance includes verifying that the product meets all applicable ecodesign performance requirements, confirming that the product information requirements have been satisfied, ensuring that the Digital Product Passport has been created and populated with all required data, verifying that the data carrier is affixed to the product or its packaging as required, and documenting the entire assessment process in the technical file.

Manufacturers should note that the ESPR conformity assessment is separate from, but complementary to, any conformity assessment required under other CE marking legislation. If a product is subject to both a safety directive and an ESPR delegated act, the manufacturer must complete both assessment procedures and ensure that the results are reflected in a single, comprehensive Declaration of Conformity.

Practical Challenges and Solutions

Integrating CE marking and DPP compliance processes presents several practical challenges for manufacturers, particularly those with large and diverse product portfolios. The most common challenges include managing the increased volume of technical documentation, coordinating between different internal teams responsible for safety compliance and sustainability compliance, and ensuring that supply chain data is accurate and complete.

Effective strategies for managing these challenges include:

• Establishing a unified compliance management system that covers both CE marking and DPP requirements, avoiding the creation of parallel processes that are difficult to maintain
• Appointing cross-functional compliance teams that include expertise in product safety, environmental regulation, and data management
• Investing in product lifecycle management (PLM) software that can generate and manage both traditional technical documentation and DPP data from a single source of truth
• Developing standardised templates for Declarations of Conformity that incorporate ESPR references alongside traditional directive citations
• Building supplier qualification processes that assess both safety compliance and sustainability data capabilities
• Engaging early with Notified Bodies to understand how ESPR requirements will be integrated into existing certification schemes

Sector-Specific Considerations

The interaction between CE marking and DPP requirements will vary significantly across product sectors, depending on which CE marking directives apply and which ESPR delegated acts are adopted. Some sectors, such as electronics and electrical equipment, are already subject to comprehensive CE marking requirements and will need to layer DPP obligations on top of existing compliance frameworks. Other sectors, such as textiles and furniture, may face DPP requirements without having significant existing CE marking obligations.

The electronics sector presents a particularly complex case, as products may be simultaneously subject to the Low Voltage Directive, the Radio Equipment Directive, the RoHS Directive, and ESPR delegated acts. Manufacturers in this sector will need sophisticated compliance management systems capable of tracking and coordinating requirements across multiple regulatory frameworks. Conversely, the textile sector, where CE marking is generally not required, will face a different challenge: establishing conformity assessment processes for ESPR compliance in the absence of existing CE marking infrastructure.

Regardless of sector, the key principle remains the same: CE marking and Digital Product Passports are complementary tools that together provide a comprehensive picture of a product's conformity with EU requirements. Businesses that recognise this complementarity and design their compliance processes accordingly will be best positioned for success in the evolving European regulatory landscape.

Conclusion

The convergence of CE marking and Digital Product Passports under the ESPR represents both a challenge and an opportunity for manufacturers. The challenge lies in managing the increased complexity of conformity assessment processes and the expanded scope of technical documentation. The opportunity lies in creating integrated compliance systems that reduce duplication, improve data quality, and provide genuine transparency to customers, regulators, and other stakeholders. By approaching CE marking and DPP compliance as two parts of a unified framework, businesses can achieve regulatory compliance more efficiently whilst also building the sustainability credentials that are increasingly essential for competitive success in the European market.