Första EU-tidsfristen för DPP (Batterier): 106 dagar Uppfyll kraven nu
Språk
EN DE FR IT ES NL PL BG CS DA EL ET FI HR HU LT LV MT PT RO SK SL SV
Produkt
Funktioner Eftermarknad Så fungerar det Demo Enterprise Priser
Sektorer
Alla sektorer Textilier Elektronik Batterier
Resurser
Blogg Jämför DPP-programvara Krav per land Bedömning av beredskap Kontroll av miljöpåståenden Gratis nedladdningar Ordlista
Företag
Partner Kontakt
Logga in Kom igång gratis
Blogg / Ordlista och vanliga frågor / XML vs JSON-LD: Data Formats for Product...
Ordlista och vanliga frågorPå engelska

XML vs JSON-LD: Data Formats for Product Passports

MyProductPassport · feb 25, 2026 · Uppdaterad nov 03, 2026 · 3 min läsning

Den här artikeln finns ännu inte på ditt språk, så den visas på engelska.

Two Approaches to Structured Data

XML (eXtensible Markup Language) and JSON-LD (JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data) are both capable of representing the structured product data required for Digital Product Passports. However, they differ significantly in complexity, web compatibility, and adoption trends.

Understanding these differences helps organisations choose the right format for their DPP implementation and data exchange needs.

XML: The Established Standard

XML has been the dominant format for enterprise data exchange for decades. It offers strong schema validation through XSD, mature tooling, and widespread enterprise system support.

However, XML has notable drawbacks for DPP use cases:

  • Verbose syntax with significant overhead from opening and closing tags
  • Complex schema definitions that require specialised expertise
  • Limited native support in modern web browsers and JavaScript frameworks
  • No built-in mechanism for semantic linking between datasets

JSON-LD: The Web-Native Choice

JSON-LD has emerged as the preferred format for DPP data exchange. It offers a compact, readable syntax and is natively supported by web technologies. Its linked data capabilities enable semantic interoperability, machines can understand the meaning of data, not just its structure.

Key advantages for DPP implementation include:

  • Compact syntax: typically 30-50% smaller than equivalent XML
  • Web-native: works with standard HTTP and REST APIs
  • Semantic context: @context maps properties to standard vocabularies
  • Search engine compatible: understood by Google and other search engines
  • Simpler tooling: any JSON library can process JSON-LD

Choosing the Right Format

For new DPP implementations, JSON-LD is the recommended choice. It aligns with the web-first approach of the ESPR, supports semantic interoperability, and offers simpler implementation. XML may still be relevant for integration with legacy enterprise systems.

MyProductPassport uses JSON-LD as its primary data format, with content negotiation supporting multiple output formats to meet diverse stakeholder needs.

Länken har kopierats
MP

MyProductPassport

Digitala produktpass

Vi hjälper företag att navigera bland kraven på digitala produktpass, ESPR-efterlevnad och transparens kring hållbara produkter.