Pierwszy termin DPP w UE (Baterie): 106 dni Zapewnij zgodność teraz
Język
EN DE FR IT ES NL PL BG CS DA EL ET FI HR HU LT LV MT PT RO SK SL SV
Produkt
Funkcje Obsługa posprzedażowa Jak to działa Demo Enterprise Cennik
Sektory
Wszystkie sektory Tekstylia Elektronika Baterie
Zasoby
Blog Porównaj oprogramowanie DPP Wymagania krajowe Ocena gotowości Sprawdzanie twierdzeń ekologicznych Bezpłatne materiały do pobrania Słownik
Firma
Partnerzy Kontakt
Zaloguj się Rozpocznij bezpłatnie
Blog / Słowniczek i FAQ / XML vs JSON-LD: Data Formats for Product...
Słowniczek i FAQPo angielsku

XML vs JSON-LD: Data Formats for Product Passports

MyProductPassport · lut 25, 2026 · Zaktualizowano lis 03, 2026 · 3 min czytania

Ten artykuł nie jest jeszcze dostępny w Twoim języku, dlatego wyświetlamy go po angielsku.

Two Approaches to Structured Data

XML (eXtensible Markup Language) and JSON-LD (JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data) are both capable of representing the structured product data required for Digital Product Passports. However, they differ significantly in complexity, web compatibility, and adoption trends.

Understanding these differences helps organisations choose the right format for their DPP implementation and data exchange needs.

XML: The Established Standard

XML has been the dominant format for enterprise data exchange for decades. It offers strong schema validation through XSD, mature tooling, and widespread enterprise system support.

However, XML has notable drawbacks for DPP use cases:

  • Verbose syntax with significant overhead from opening and closing tags
  • Complex schema definitions that require specialised expertise
  • Limited native support in modern web browsers and JavaScript frameworks
  • No built-in mechanism for semantic linking between datasets

JSON-LD: The Web-Native Choice

JSON-LD has emerged as the preferred format for DPP data exchange. It offers a compact, readable syntax and is natively supported by web technologies. Its linked data capabilities enable semantic interoperability, machines can understand the meaning of data, not just its structure.

Key advantages for DPP implementation include:

  • Compact syntax: typically 30-50% smaller than equivalent XML
  • Web-native: works with standard HTTP and REST APIs
  • Semantic context: @context maps properties to standard vocabularies
  • Search engine compatible: understood by Google and other search engines
  • Simpler tooling: any JSON library can process JSON-LD

Choosing the Right Format

For new DPP implementations, JSON-LD is the recommended choice. It aligns with the web-first approach of the ESPR, supports semantic interoperability, and offers simpler implementation. XML may still be relevant for integration with legacy enterprise systems.

MyProductPassport uses JSON-LD as its primary data format, with content negotiation supporting multiple output formats to meet diverse stakeholder needs.

Link skopiowany do schowka
MP

MyProductPassport

Cyfrowe Paszporty Produktów

Pomagamy firmom poruszać się po wymaganiach Cyfrowego Paszportu Produktu, zgodności z ESPR i transparentności produktów zrównoważonych.