Best DPP Software for Battery Manufacturers 2026

Ten artykuł nie jest jeszcze dostępny w Twoim języku, dlatego wyświetlamy go po angielsku.

The Battery Passport: A Unique DPP Challenge

Battery manufacturers face the most technically demanding Digital Product Passport requirements of any product category. The EU Battery Regulation — which entered into force ahead of most ESPR delegated acts — mandates a "battery passport" for every light means of transport (LMT) battery, every industrial battery above 2 kWh, and every electric vehicle battery placed on the EU market, with the requirement applying from 18 February 2027.

What makes the battery passport unique is its combination of static manufacturing data, dynamic performance data, and critical raw material traceability requirements. Unlike a textile DPP that primarily captures point-of-manufacture data, a battery passport must be updated throughout the battery's operational life — recording state of health, charge cycles, capacity degradation, and maintenance events. This creates fundamentally different technical requirements for the underlying software platform.

The stakes are also exceptionally high. Battery passports are a prerequisite for placing batteries on the EU market. Non-compliance does not merely result in fines — it means your products cannot be sold. Given the multi-year lead times in battery manufacturing and the capital intensity of the sector, choosing the right DPP platform early is essential for avoiding costly delays and disruption.

Battery Regulation Data Requirements

The EU Battery Regulation specifies an extensive set of data fields that must be included in every battery passport. Understanding these requirements in detail is a prerequisite for evaluating whether a DPP platform can support your compliance needs.

The mandatory data elements fall into several categories:

• General information — Manufacturer identity, battery model, manufacturing date and location, weight, and capacity. Unique identifiers following the specified standard.
• Material composition — Detailed chemistry information including cathode and anode materials, electrolyte composition, and a list of all materials including hazardous substances. Critical raw material content (cobalt, lithium, nickel, lead) must be disclosed with provenance data.
• Performance and durability — Rated capacity, energy density, expected lifetime in cycles and years, temperature operating range, and round-trip efficiency. These values must be updated with actual performance data throughout the battery's life.
• Carbon footprint — Product carbon footprint calculated per kWh of battery capacity, covering the entire lifecycle from raw material extraction through manufacturing, use, and end-of-life processing.
• Recycled content — Percentage of recycled cobalt, lead, lithium, and nickel used in the battery, with documentation of the recycling source.
• End-of-life information — Disassembly instructions, safety precautions for handling, transport classification, and recycling process requirements.

The dynamic data requirements — state of health, remaining capacity, and usage history — must be accessible through the battery passport for the entire operational life of the battery, which may span 10 to 20 years for EV batteries. This has significant implications for platform selection.

Critical Platform Features for Battery DPPs

Battery passport software must support several capabilities that go beyond what general-purpose DPP platforms offer. When evaluating platforms, battery manufacturers should pay particular attention to these differentiating features.

Real-time data integration is essential for capturing dynamic battery performance data. The platform must accept data feeds from battery management systems (BMS) — the embedded controllers that monitor cell voltages, temperatures, and charge states in real time. Look for platforms that support standard BMS communication protocols and can ingest high-frequency telemetry data, aggregate it into the required performance metrics, and update the battery passport accordingly.

Critical raw material traceability is a cornerstone of the Battery Regulation. The platform must support multi-tier supply chain data collection for cobalt, natural graphite, lithium and nickel, the four materials in the Regulation's due diligence chapter, tracing them from mine site through refining and processing to cell manufacturing. This requires integration with upstream supplier systems and, potentially, with industry traceability initiatives such as the Global Battery Alliance's Battery Passport.

Lifecycle state management distinguishes battery passports from most other DPP types. A battery's passport must evolve through multiple lifecycle states — manufacturing, first use, second use (if repurposed), and end of life — with different data requirements and access permissions at each stage. The platform must model these state transitions and ensure that the passport data is updated correctly as the battery moves through its lifecycle.

Platforms for EV Battery Manufacturers

Electric vehicle battery manufacturers typically operate at large scale with significant technical resources. Their DPP platform requirements emphasise integration depth, data volume handling, and compliance across multiple regulatory jurisdictions — as EV batteries sold globally must meet EU Battery Regulation requirements for the European market alongside other regional standards.

Enterprise platforms with dedicated battery modules are the primary option for large EV battery manufacturers. These platforms typically offer pre-built data models aligned to the Battery Regulation's technical annex, connectors for major BMS platforms, and integration with automotive OEM systems that receive battery data as part of vehicle assembly.

For manufacturers who are part of larger automotive groups, the DPP platform choice may be influenced by corporate IT strategy and existing vendor relationships. However, battery-specific platforms often outperform general enterprise solutions because they are built around the unique data model of battery passports rather than adapting a generic product data model to fit battery requirements.

Regardless of platform choice, EV battery manufacturers should ensure that the platform supports the versioning and update mechanisms needed for dynamic passport data. A battery passport that is only accurate at the point of manufacture — and never updated with performance data — does not meet the regulation's intent or its letter.

Solutions for Industrial and Portable Battery Producers

Industrial battery manufacturers — producing batteries for telecommunications, data centres, renewable energy storage, and material handling equipment — face battery passport requirements that differ in scale and complexity from the EV sector. Product catalogues may be smaller, but product configurations can be highly customised, with batteries built to specific customer specifications.

For industrial battery producers, DPP platforms that support configurable product templates are particularly valuable. Rather than creating each passport from scratch, a template-based approach allows you to define a base passport structure for a battery platform and then customise it for each configuration — varying capacity, voltage, chemistry, and mounting options — without duplicating effort.

Portable battery manufacturers — producing batteries for consumer electronics, power tools, and light electric vehicles — face the challenge of high volume and low per-unit value. Portable consumer batteries fall outside the passport mandate, but batteries for power tools and light electric vehicles frequently qualify as LMT or industrial batteries above 2 kWh — and at those volumes, a platform that efficiently handles thousands or millions of passport records with minimal per-unit cost is essential.

Mid-market platforms like MyProductPassport can serve industrial and smaller battery manufacturers effectively, particularly when complemented by API integration with manufacturing execution systems. The key advantage of these platforms is their faster implementation timeline and lower total cost compared to enterprise alternatives, making them practical choices for battery producers who need to achieve compliance quickly without multi-month implementation projects.

Carbon Footprint and Recycled Content Tracking

Two of the most technically challenging aspects of battery passport compliance are carbon footprint declaration and recycled content verification. The platform you choose must support both with adequate rigour and documentation.

Carbon footprint calculation for batteries is governed by specific rules laid out in the Battery Regulation. The calculation must cover the entire lifecycle and be expressed per kWh of energy storage capacity. Most battery manufacturers will need to work with LCA specialists to perform the initial calculation, but the DPP platform must store and present the results in the correct format, including the methodology used, data sources, and any assumptions made.

Recycled content tracking requires documented evidence that specified percentages of cobalt, lead, lithium, and nickel in the battery genuinely come from recycled sources. The minimum recycled content thresholds increase over time — for example, 16 percent recycled cobalt by 2031, rising to 26 percent by 2036. The platform must track material provenance at sufficient granularity to demonstrate compliance and must support the documentation chain from recycling facility through material processing to cell manufacturing.

Look for platforms that provide structured fields for carbon footprint data and recycled content documentation, including the ability to attach supporting evidence such as material certificates, audit reports, and supply chain declarations. Generic file attachment is not sufficient — the platform should understand the semantic meaning of these documents and validate them against regulatory requirements.

Making Your Battery DPP Platform Decision

Given the February 2027 compliance deadline for the first wave of battery passports, battery manufacturers should be finalising their platform selection now if they have not already done so. Implementation, data collection, and testing cycles mean that starting in the autumn of 2026 leaves very little margin for error.

Prioritise platforms that demonstrate production-ready compliance with the Battery Regulation's technical specifications. Request evidence of real battery passports that meet the regulation's data requirements — not mock-ups or roadmap promises. Ask for reference customers in your battery segment (EV, industrial, or portable) and speak with them about their implementation experience.

Consider starting with a pilot covering a single battery product line. This allows you to validate the platform's capabilities, establish data collection workflows with your supply chain, and identify integration requirements before committing to a full-scale rollout. The insights from this pilot are invaluable for refining your implementation approach and building internal expertise.

Finally, evaluate the platform provider's long-term commitment to the battery segment. Battery passports require ongoing platform support for 10 to 20 years of battery operational life. A provider that offers battery DPP features today but may deprioritise them tomorrow is a significant business risk. Look for providers with a clear battery strategy, active participation in industry standards bodies, and a financial position that supports long-term product investment.